vendor lock-in → exit plan
Get an exact quote
9 products · 72 migration paths

Message & Streaming migration paths

Messaging and streaming licensing — Confluent, IBM MQ, TIBCO — is priced per core or by throughput. These paths compare moving to open-source brokers and streaming platforms.

Confluent Platform
Confluent · Subscription / CKU
View all alternatives →
IBM MQ
IBM · Per-core + support
View all alternatives →
TIBCO EMS
Cloud Software Group · Per-core license
View all alternatives →
Apache Kafka
Open source · Free (self-managed)
View all alternatives →
RabbitMQ
Open source · Free OSS
View all alternatives →
NATS
Open source · Free (open source)
View all alternatives →
Solace PubSub+
Solace · Per-broker / subscription
View all alternatives →
Apache Pulsar
Open source · Free (self-managed)
View all alternatives →
Redpanda
Open source · Free OSS / Enterprise
View all alternatives →

Message & Streaming migration guide

Messaging and streaming licensing is priced per core or by throughput, and premium connectors/features add up. Open brokers — Apache Kafka, RabbitMQ, NATS, Pulsar (and Kafka-compatible Redpanda) — remove the subscription while preserving familiar protocols. The key to a clean migration is bridging so producers and consumers move without message loss.

Choosing a target

  • Kafka (KRaft mode) — the default for high-throughput streaming and log/event pipelines.
  • RabbitMQ — classic queueing/routing (AMQP) for task and work-queue patterns.
  • NATS — lightweight, low-latency pub/sub and request-reply.
  • Pulsar / Redpanda — Kafka-API-compatible options with different operational tradeoffs.

Inventory first

Catalog topics/queues, partitions, ACLs, and delivery semantics (ordering, at-least-once vs exactly-once), then baseline throughput and consumer lag.

Bridge, then repoint

Stand up the target cluster and recreate topics/queues + ACLs. Bridge during transition — MirrorMaker 2 for Kafka, or Kafka Connect / shovels for cross-broker — to replicate messages and offsets. Then repoint producers first, consumers second, drain backlogs, and cut over once consumer lag reaches zero.

Validation

Throughput/latency benchmark, delivery-semantics and ordering tests, consumer-failover and replay tests, and a backpressure/soak test. The acceptance bar is “no message loss and ordering/semantics preserved under load.”

Sizing & cost

Bills scale with broker cores/throughput. Self-hosted brokers shift cost to compute + operations, usually far lower at scale. Size on broker cores and peak throughput.

De-risking

Validate semantics on a non-critical topic first, keep the bridge running until parity is confirmed, and don’t decommission the source broker until consumers are stable.

Open a source→target page for broker-specific steps and a per-core TCO model.