vendor lock-in → exit plan
Get an exact quote
Message & Streaming migration path

From Confluent Platform to Apache Kafka

Cost comparison, a phase-by-phase migration plan, and the automation to execute it.

Effort
Medium
Est. timeline
~15 wks
Apache Kafka model
Free (self-managed)
Open source
Yes
▶ Model your savings in the calculator

3-year cost calculator

Pre-filled for Confluent Platform → Apache Kafka. Adjust every figure with your own numbers.

Every figure here is an illustrative estimate, not a vendor quote. Defaults are editable starting points compiled from public information; real, binding pricing comes from the vendor or an authorized distributor. See our methodology.

Sized at 96 broker cores — cost is computed on this.
Stay on Confluent Platform (3yr)
$115,200
Move to Apache Kafka (3yr + migration)
$68,640
Projected savings
$46,560 (40%)
Payback period
20.3 mo
Build a decision report from these numbers:

All figures are illustrative and fully editable — adjust the cost-per-core and migration inputs with your own numbers. Not guaranteed vendor pricing (defaults reviewed May 2026). For a binding quote, use the request form below to reach an authorized distributor or partner.

Quick comparison: Confluent Platform vs Apache Kafka

Common trade-offs teams weigh when staying on Confluent Platform versus moving to Apache Kafka. These are general, commonly-reported considerations — not statements of fact about any vendor — so check them against your own contract and the vendors' current terms.

Confluent Platform Current
Confluent · Subscription / CKU
  • Already in production — no migration effort or risk
  • Mature ecosystem with vendor support and SLAs
  • Subscription/CKU pricing scales with throughput
  • Premium connectors and features add cost
  • Cloud egress and add-on fees
  • Ongoing subscription / cku cost to budget for
Apache Kafka Planned
Open source · Free (self-managed)
  • Open source — no license fees
  • No vendor lock-in
  • Cost model: Free (self-managed)
  • Requires a migration (~15 weeks, medium effort)
  • Community support by default — paid support optional

Why teams evaluate alternatives to Confluent Platform

Reasons commonly cited by users and in public industry coverage for re-evaluating Confluent Platform. These are general, reported considerations — not statements of fact about Confluent — and may not reflect your situation or the vendor's current terms. Verify against your own contract before deciding.

  • Subscription/CKU pricing scales with throughput
  • Premium connectors and features add cost
  • Cloud egress and add-on fees

The migration plan

Roughly 15 weeks for a mid-size estate, in six phases.

Assessment & discovery
Inventory every workload, dependency, and integration; flag anything high-risk.
Target design & sizing
Size the new platform, design storage and networking, set RPO/RTO and rollback criteria.
Pilot migration
Migrate a small low-risk set end-to-end and validate the runbook.
↳ Stand up open-source Apache Kafka (KRaft); migrate topics/configs; mirror with MirrorMaker 2; repoint producers/consumers; cut over after lag drains.
Production migration
Move workloads in scheduled waves using automation; verify after each wave.
Validation & optimization
Tune performance, confirm backup/DR, and update monitoring and docs.
Decommission source
Reclaim licenses, retire old infrastructure, and capture lessons learned.

Tooling & automation

Stand up open-source Apache Kafka (KRaft); migrate topics/configs; mirror with MirrorMaker 2; repoint producers/consumers; cut over after lag drains.

OffVendor's wizard pre-fills these scripts with your environment — inventory export, disk/schema conversion, bulk provisioning, and validation.

Frequently asked

Is migrating from Confluent Platform to Apache Kafka worth it?

For most teams facing rising Confluent Platform costs, yes — Apache Kafka (free (self-managed)) typically lowers 3-year total cost of ownership, though the right answer depends on workload complexity and in-house skills. Use the calculator to model your own numbers.

How long does a Confluent Platform to Apache Kafka migration take?

A typical mid-size estimate is around 15 weeks across six phases — discovery, design, pilot, waved production migration, validation, and decommission. Larger or more complex estates take longer.

What tools are used to migrate from Confluent Platform to Apache Kafka?

Stand up open-source Apache Kafka (KRaft); migrate topics/configs; mirror with MirrorMaker 2; repoint producers/consumers; cut over after lag drains.

Get a vendor-accurate Apache Kafka quote

A guided builder that turns your estimates into a requirements report you can send to a vendor, partner, or distributor to secure a binding quote.

How this works — and what's yours to provide
  • Your inputs, your responsibility. The figures and estimates here describe your environment and requirements — please make sure they're accurate. OffVendor's defaults are illustrative starting points only, not vendor pricing.
  • It generates a requirements report (RFQ). Use it to capture your sizing and requirements and share it with your authorized vendor / partner / distributor to obtain a final, binding quote.
  • Then close the loop on your TCO. When the real quote comes back, plug those actual prices into the calculator above to refine your TCO and see where reality differs from the estimate.
  1. 1Size it
  2. 2Requirements
  3. 3Your details
  4. 4Channels & export

How big is your Confluent Platform estate?

vSphere licenses physical cores across all hosts (16-core minimum per CPU). Not sure? Enter rough numbers — the distributor confirms exact counts later.

96 broker cores
Default mid-size assumption (96 broker cores)
Estimates are illustrative and configurable; production figures come from vendor list prices and your own quotes.